Padres Still Flirting with Hosmer, But Isn’t Carlos Santana a Better Option?

Credit: MLB

Credit: AP Photo

The Eric Hosmer talk will not die down. It is everywhere. And now that the Friars have lost out on Shohei Ohtani, the talk seems to have picked up steam.

Even Peter Seidler, who is normally quite subdued, came out and spoke to the local media. He talked about his disappointment in losing out on Ohtani but did say that the team made their best effort to secure his services. The team seems insistent on getting better for 2018 as they continue to flirt with Eric Hosmer, and frankly, that scares me.

First off, I like Eric Hosmer. He is an excellent left-handed glove at first base and a hitter who has progressed with the bat. At the age of 28, he should still have something left in his tank. He has four Gold Gloves and is coming off his best season as a professional where he slugged 25 homers, hit .318, and recorded a .385 on-base percentage. Hosmer is a good player, but he about to be paid like he is a great one.

The young first baseman has totaled seven years of service time in MLB, and he is certainly entitled to be paid for it. His career has been very productive, and there are reports he and his agent Scott Boras are asking for an 8-10 year deal in the area of $180-200 million. Wow. Just Wow. That would be a major investment and something the Padres should really think twice about. Not that Hosmer isn’t worth the money now, but the tail end of a long-term deal like that could get very burdening for a franchise.

There is no doubt that Hosmer will eclipse the $120 million mark this winter. He is a quality addition. Should the Padres hand out the highest contract in the history of the franchise? Is Hosmer worth that kind of money? Or are the Padres just like a teenager with their first paycheck in hand? It is no secret that the team has money to spend, but how they should spend it is up for much debate.

If you ask me, the owners are getting tired of being told they don’t care. The knowledgeable fan realizes that there is currently a process being developed. This process takes time, and it can certainly be painful. The fruits are already showing, though, as the minor league system is flourishing (Michel Baez, Gabriel Arias, Fernando Tatis), and the major league team already has young stars to watch on an everyday basis (Wil Myers, Manuel Margot, Austin Hedges, Hunter Renfroe). Peter Seidler and Ron Fowler are just going to have to endure another season of progression before this team starts to compete.

Patience has never been a strong suit for Padre fans. And rightfully so, as the fan base has been beaten and abused most of its existence. With the numerous ownership moves and philosophy changes, this franchise had been just spinning its wheels for decades. With A.J. Preller and his staff in place, the clouds are lifting, and Padre fans can see the promised land.

Credit: MLB

Signing Eric Hosmer would be a sexy thing to do. Fans would definitely love it, and the Padres would get immediate national press. However, the Padres are far from competing. Adding Hosmer would give the team arguably five more wins on the season, and that is being generous. Paying a contract like that to inch towards being a .500 team is not wise. There are other options. Options that can be useful now, and the team will not have to commit for more than a couple of seasons.

Carlos Santana is a very decent option for the Friars. He, like Hosmer, is tied to draft-pick compensation after Santana rejected the $17.4 million qualifying offer from the Indians last month. Losing a pick would be rough, but Santana is only expected to ink a three or four-year deal, and reports have that in the neighborhood of $45-60 million. That would be a fraction of the cost of Eric Hosmer and definitely worth looking into.

The former catcher is 31 (32 when the season starts) but still figures to be productive well into his mid 30’s. In delving into his numbers versus Hosmer, you can see that their career totals in games played and at-bats are eerily similar. Santana has played 1,116 games and recorded 3,994 at-bats, while Hosmer has played 1,048 games and recorded 3,991 at-bats. You can’t get much closer than that when comparing two major leaguers who played in the same division and faced the same pitching each year.

Career totals of Eric Hosmer and Carlos Santana

  • WAR totals Homer 14.1, Santana 24.5
  • HR Totals Hosmer 127, Santana 174
  • OPS Hosmer .781, Santana .810
  • OPS+ Hosmer 111, Santana 121
  • SLG Hosmer .439, Santana .445
  • OBP Hosmer .342, Santana .365
  • Stolen Bases Hosmer 60, Santana 40
  • Defensive War Hosmer -4.1, Santana -3.9 (last four years only)

Looking at these numbers, it is amazing that Hosmer is looking to get at least three times what Santana will get on the open market. Yes, Hosmer is three years younger, but his value is really inflated at the moment. Santana is a switch-hitter and though he was moved from behind the dish, has great defensive skill at the position. He also reportedly wants to get better, as 2017 was his best defensive year at first.

The book on Eric Hosmer is that he is a gamer. He loves the game of baseball and is a definite clubhouse leader. Santana, though much quieter, can still help lead the Padres as he has a Latin influence that would surely be beneficial with all the young Latino players coming through the system. Hosmer might have the edge as far as leadership skill, but is that worth all that extra money? Is that worth the potential to get stuck with a bad contract?

In the end, the Padres will do what they please. Eric Hosmer might be the sexy pick, but Carlos Santana is the smart choice.

What do you think?

(Visited 1,062 times, 1 visits today)
James Clark on FacebookJames Clark on LinkedinJames Clark on PinterestJames Clark on Twitter
James Clark
James was born and raised in America's Finest City. He is a passionate baseball fan with even more passion towards his hometown Padres. Editor-In-Chief of EastVillageTimes.com. Always striving to bring you the highest quality in San Diego Sports News. Original content, with original ideas, that's our motto. Enjoy.

9 thoughts on “Padres Still Flirting with Hosmer, But Isn’t Carlos Santana a Better Option?

  1. Does anybody care about how this lineup has ZERO LH bats in it long term. Once all this talent finally arrives, how long will it take for them to turn the corner? Two more years. Will any of these waiver wire or Rule 5 guys ever be part of the core of a contending team? NO!!! Who is going to hit over .300 in the 3 hole. Who can help manufacturer runs and be 80% of what Gwynn gave us out of the 2 hole. You study how all the rosters of the playoff teams this year were built and none of them came together in a single year.

  2. Bad idea. Anyone can spend big bucks on known talent. Let AJ keep finding the sleepers, and Balsley keep resurrecting careers. The time to spend money will come soon enough.

  3. Hopefully at most they are just driving up the price for Hosmer and if they really want to move Myers will get Santana or Logan Morrison. My preference is they wait for their 1B prospect who finished last year at AA.

    1. I’m not sure if Naylor is quite there though, he wasn’t supposed to have a super high ceiling so maybe they’ll bring him along slower. I like your idea on Morrison though. Waaay smarter

  4. I think the Padres have yet again lost their way, wandering off the path of building from within and choosing free agents carefully. Although I’m not a big Wil Myers fan at all, the Padres gave him the largest contract in history and now want to send him back to the outfield (where he was absolutely awful)l? True he’d play a corner spot instead of center, but I think he should be left at first to sink or swim. Let’s see if he can finally live up to the promise that the Padres saw in him for more than half a season.

    1. Yeah possibly. I don’t know how you couldn’t ink Wil for like 50 mill with the injuries and production history. Preller has been great with the prospects but his understanding of contracts leaves a lot to be desired. Just pretending they can outbid the Red Sox, this deal could be a bad one. That being said, holy shit does this team need a left handed bat, veteran leadership and maybe even a “face” of the franchise. Judging by Wil’s numbers, he’s not comfortable at all as a front man………

  5. Just the fact that the Padres have expressed so much interest in Hosmer is disconcerting and alarming, and it does not bode well for the future. He is what he is, but signing him is so wrong on so many different levels, and it would set the franchise back for several years.

    When did a firstbaseman become a need, or even a relative need? There are SO many other legitimate needs on this roster, and the Padres are seeking to invest heavily (over the next several years) in the least needed-NON-need? What??! There WAS some hope for the Padres, yet signing Hosmer will kill all of it.

    1. Lol yeah, spot on Tommy T. Hosmer has all the qualities we need (except the position) but not at that price. Go figure.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Copyright © All rights reserved. | CoverNews by AF themes.