How the Padres fit the current state of Major League Baseball

Credit: AP Photo

Mandatory Credit: Orlando Ramirez-USA TODAY Sports

Tenet #6: Swing and Miss Pitching Staff

Padres grade = A-

Of all qualifiers in 2020, Dinelson Lamet’s K/9 rate ranked fifth-best in baseball at 12.1.  And, though Zach Davies surprisingly logged 8.1 per nine, the Padres found out a chasm of difference between regular season and postseason pitching exists.  Further, Davies posted a 7-4 record with a 2.79 ERA in leading the Padres to their first postseason games in well over a decade.  But, in two postseason starts, Bat Boy went 0-1 with a 10.29 ERA, logging a total of 7 innings and providing a mere 6 K’s.  In the postseason, the focus and analysis ratchet up, and a pitch that may have gotten an out in May is spit on either by hitters taking it as a ball or taking it for a long ride.  Additionally, the perceived probability that Lamet and fellow ace, Mike Clevinger who is lost for the 2021 season to Tommy John, would be able to give 30 starts in each of the next few seasons, lowered.  

The result became obvious: reinforcements who could get swings and misses became a priority.  The Padres dealt a number of far-from-the-Majors talents and wisely acquired ace-level stuff for moderate costs.  Blake Snell joined first, and his K/9 in 2020 was 11.34, just down from his 2019 run at 12.36.  Yu Darvish followed, and his 2020 K/9 finished 11th in the game of all qualifiers at 11.0.  With a healthy Lamet, San Diego heads into 2021 with three of the top dozen starting pitchers in the game at the art of the strikeout.  

But that’s not all they did.  They also added Joe Musgrove, an El Cajon native.  His K/9 rate spiked in 2020 to a personal high of 12.48.  Adding swing and miss is one side of the equation, but gradually the Padres have also moved pitchers with lower swing and miss: Davies, Joey Lucchesi (7.9), David Bednar (7.1), and Garrett Richards (8.1) are examples.  A full, intentional shift has been accomplished, and when Clevinger returns in 2022, the nastiness of this rotation could be legendary.

The bullpen employs a handful of names who have strong K/9 rates as well, but most have not previously projected to be the traditional back-end pieces.  On the other hand, Drew Pomeranz operated at a 14.0 K/9 in 2020 and actually performed higher yet at 15.4 in 2019.  Austin Adams registered an impressive 15.8 K/9, albeit in a bit role in 2020.  There would need to be significant reorganization in the bullpen to call this unit a strikeout force.  And, that’s entirely possible.  Names like Mason Thompson, Jose Castillo, and even some of the triumvirate of Chris Paddack, Ryan Weathers, and Adrian Morejon may become household Padres bullpen studs in a matter of months depending on how the rotation shakes out.  

The one head-scratcher to this apparent philosophical shift lies the recent signing of 35-year-old Mark Melancon, whose 2020 K/9 was a paltry 5.6.  Some writers tab him as a closer for this unit; this seems incomprehensibly inaccurate.  With all of the inflexibility the current pen makeup faces due to limited possible movement to the minors for many arms, it seems more moves (shocking, I know) are destined to come.

The organization impressed the teacher overall: A-.  If one wants to remediate or earn extra credit, this article gives more detail on the art and importance of swing and miss pitching.

Tenet #7: A Multi-Faceted Offense; A High Floor Defense

Padres grade = A-

Having a multi-faceted offense simply means being able to score in many ways: power, average, baserunning, on-base %, etc.  To earn an “A” here requires a lineup and perceived bench with multi-skilled players abounding.

2020 showed the Padres offense in rare air.  For many years, the Padres malnourished offense ranked at or near the very bottom in many (most?) offensive categories.  Rather than moving fences and blaming dense layers of air, this group recognized the need to swing at strikes instead of balls, to make contact at a greater rate, and to show desire to get on base, understanding that solo home runs fail to win ball games.  Baseball has always been so; it was so in 2020; it will always be so.  

Credit: Getty Images

How do we know the Padres have improved?  The Padres finished 5th in the game (45.1) in offensive runs above average last season in a meteoric rise.  For those unfamiliar with the metric, Fangraphs details it here well.  In short, “OFF” measures a player’s (or team’s) context-neutral batting runs and base-running runs above average.  These statistics experience a park-adjustment and weight to give credit for the quantity and quality of run-scoring.  In order, the Braves (64.1), Dodgers (60.9), Mets (51.4), and Yankees (49.7) placed ahead of them.  For the first time in recent memory, the Padres offense was not only not a liability but rather a strength.

San Diego finished 14th in walk % (9.1), which is a welcomed sight, yet they did lag behind in strikeout %, amassing 21.5% and finishing 25th in the game.  Keep in mind that these show a collective improvement.  Key offensive players added to that 2020 crew include Ha-Seong Kim, whose on-base % in the KBO was .397, and Victor Caratini, a switch-hitting catcher with a .699 OPS in 2020, show useful additions, bringing multi-tooled talents to the team. 

The equally important defensive metrics also favored the Padres in 2020.  They tied the Chicago Cubs for second in the game at a 7.4 defensive runs above average, trailing only the Oakland A’s (9.8).  Likewise, for those unaware of the types of measures used in today’s baseball, Fangraphs defines it well here.  In short, two variants are combined to create a player or team DEF: fielding runs above average and positional adjustment.  In other words, how many runs can a team prevent above average, and how would their players fare if placed in other positions. 

Gold-glove-winning centerfielder Trent Grisham really skews the team score as he alone posited an eye-popping DEF of 8.3.  Machado and FTJ pace the rest of the roster with 3.2 and 3.1 DEF in 2020, respectively.  Room for growth exists, but in comparison with their peers, the Padres hold a strong position heading into 2021.

The grade?  San Diego earns an A-, sitting near the top of the field.

How the 2021 Padres fare over a 162 game schedule remains anybody’s guess, but the organization’s health and direction signals every-year attempts at glory.  Your father’s Fathers can only watch in envy. With thanks to an ownership group and front office that have been used to move proverbial mountains, all Padres supporters can look forward to the next game, the next season, and the next decade with unparalleled anticipation.

(Visited 1,179 times, 1 visits today)
M. Robert Klemesrud
M. Robert Klemesrud, born and currently residing in the great state of Iowa, is an educator of 25 years. Having studied journalism at the University of Iowa, played baseball in the Missouri Valley, and followed the Padres religiously for over 30 years, he has found the perfect place to align some of his passions at East Village Times.

4 thoughts on “How the Padres fit the current state of Major League Baseball

  1. Thank you both. Unfortunately, I can only write these when I have time and inspiration for now. This summer that will change. Often, that leads to hurried pieces with at times semi-redundant sections and an occasional jaw-breaker sentence. I just re-read it and grimaced. It should be written better honestly. However, positive reinforcement is always appreciated, and relevant content exists in it. I hope we continue to have more and more reason to write and read amazing developments in Padre-land. I hope you continue to find value in the East Village Times, its writers/creators, and its content.

    Mi padre’s Padres started with the ’84 pennant winners. Some of my friends donned Chicago Cubs gear as it appeared they were on their way to eclipsing their organizational drought. I hate bandwagoning in general; I made the statement, down 0-2 in the 5 game set, “If the Padres come back and win this series, I’ll be a Padres fan for life.” They won game 3; they won game 4, and game 5 sealed it. Tony Gwynn was beginning his ascent in becoming my lifelong sports hero. For a long time, his greatness was enough to overshadow the often mediocre team results. I live in the Midwest, and almost no one here has been following San Diego. So, I’m stoked that the entire baseball world seems to have no choice but to take notice of the positives that are happening.

    Here’s to hoping for a 3-year run of back-to-back-to-back World Series titles.

    1. Yes, good times. I remember wearing my Cubs buster tshirt for many days. Tony will always be Mr Padre. Fernando is the new face of the Padres and will be for many years to come. However, there was, and will be, only ONE Tony Gwynn. He was amazing. I’d like to see an article on those with the least amount of strikeouts in MLB. I doubt people even know how seldom TGwynn struck out. The best contact hitter ever in my opinion. Home runs are fun but Tony was Tony. We were usually surprised when he didn’t get a hit.

      I look forward to more of your pieces.

  2. That was an outstanding article. I thoroughly enjoyed the intricacy of your information. I appreciate the research you did to write such a piece.

    I am the father’s father. I’ve been going to games since I was 10 in 1969. I remember all the (cough cough) lean years. I grew up idolizing Nate Colbert, Chris Cannizzaro, and others. I couldn’t wait to read the sports page when I woke up to see if they’d won the night before. How I enjoyed watching Randy Jones throwing 90 minute games for a last place team. Now… Now… we are on the precipice of being rewarded for unrewarded loyalty. To KNOW our team is positioned to compete for a title this year and for many more… it’s exciting.

    Thank you for the inspiring article. I look forward to more of yours.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © All rights reserved. | CoverNews by AF themes.